Blog

Why do you think Plunkitt was so open about how he made his money? First, I want to say a few things about Plunkitt. His real name was George W. Plunkitt to begin with. Plunkitt was a millionaire. Plunkitt was born on November 17, 1842. Plunkitt was a millionaire. He was also involved in politics. He was a politician from the New York State. He also served in “both houses of the New York State Legislature”. He was also “a vehement critic of the Civil Service”. He was a master in machine politics. Plunkitt was in charge of Tammany Hall for a time until he died on November 19, 1924; two days after his eighty-second birthday.

He had a very odd and strange way to gain power and help people at the same time. Whether he was in office or out of office, he did his best to find jobs for the people. Because he did this the people remained loyal and subject to Plunkitt, and that is how he got his power he had years ago. It is very impressive how he became a powerful man just by gaining the trust of the people by helping them find jobs. To do this he must have been really smart. The reason he found jobs for the people is because he cared about the people. He was in politics for some time and he knew that Patriotism was supporting the people of the state. Patriotism is supporting one’s country. The country is not the land, or the government, but the people. So, he thought that if he found jobs for the people of the state he would be doing the right thing. He did this whether he was in office or out of office. Plus, he gained the loyalty of the people which got him his power.  As I said before, To do this he must have been really smart. Well, he was a really smart guy. Don’t you think so too?

Now, back to the topic of this paper: Why do you think Plunkitt was so open about how he made his money? The answer to this is, He cares about the people. That is right. He cares about the people he told them his secret to how to become rich and powerful. Remember that I told you that he cares about the people so much he found jobs for people who needed them? He cares about people so much that he told them how he became rich and powerful. He did not want them to become poor, because what kind of person would people call him then? Besides, it was his duty to look after the people and take care of them. And one of the ways he could do that is if he told us his secret on how to become rich and powerful, which is what he did. He even wrote about it in his autobiography. He must have really cared about the people to give up his secret on how to become rich and powerful just so that they do not become poor.

How serious was Plunkitt about patriotism’s connection to obtaining a job after Tammany won an election? First, I would like to tell you who Plunkitt and Tammany are. His real name was George W. Plunkitt. Plunkitt was born on November 17, 1842. Plunkitt was a millionaire. He was also involved in politics. He was a politician from the New York State. He also served in “both houses of the New York State Legislature”. He was also “a vehement critic of the Civil Service”. He was a master in machine politics. And as for Tammany, it is NOT A PERSON. It is really called Tammany Hall. “Tammany Hall, also known as the Society of St. Tammany, the Sons of St. Tammany, or the Columbian Order, was a New York City political organization founded in 1786 and incorporated on May 12, 1789, as the Tammany Society”. Plunkitt was in charge of Tammany Hall for a time until he died on November 19, 1924; two days after his eighty-second birthday.

Plunkitt was a very powerful man. Here is why. Whether he was in or out of office, he did his best to find jobs for the people. Because he did this the people remained loyal and subject to Plunkitt, and that is how he got his power he had years ago. It is very impressive how he became a powerful man just by gaining the trust of the people by helping them find jobs. It is also a very smart idea on how to become a powerful person. He must have been a very smart person. It is also amazing that he could find jobs for the people or find people who could find jobs for the people. I think finding jobs for people is a weird, but efficient way to gain power and help people at the same time.

Patriotism is supporting one’s country. The country is not the land, or the government, but the people. Plunkitt’s idea of supporting one’s country (or people) is to find them jobs, in or out of office. Like if he had an open spot in anything for anyone who wanted to take it and he new someone who was jobless, than he would give that job to the jobless person, and he did that so that people would think that he was a very good person so they would remain loyal to him and that is how he got his power. As I said before, I think finding jobs for people is a weird, but efficient way to gain power and help people at the same time. It is also very creative.

How serious was Plunkitt about patriotism’s connection to obtaining a job after Tammany won an election? He was so serious about it that it did not matter if he was in office or out of office, or if he was rich or not, he tried to find people jobs because he thought that that was how patriotism worked, which it basically did, but that is how serious Plunkitt was about patriotism.

Which aspect of the plot of In His Steps so far sounds most implausible? In His Steps was written by Charles Monroe Sheldon. It is said to be one of the best-selling books of all time selling over fifty-million copies first being published in 1896. The full title of the book is In His Steps: What Would Jesus Do. I recently read it as a school book and I really liked it. It is nick-named What Would Jesus Do because at the beginning of the book Rev. Henry Maxwell, the pastor of a church, challenges everyone in the church that in every situation or problem they have they ask themselves “What would Jesus do?” for a whole year (but they did not have to do it if they did not want to). This phrase is referred to throughout the book. Some Christians even use this phrase now, two hundred years after the book was even published.

What I think is most implausible (which means not likely to happen) is when a random person comes to Rev. Maxwell’s house and asks Maxwell to find him a job. Maxwell says he probably can and the person leaves. The next day at church the man comes to church, comes to the pulpit, and says that the church treated him very badly (we never find out how) and passes out. He dies a few days later. I think this is implausible because people randomly passing out and dying later is not possible, and if it is, it is extremely rare.

What I think is also implausible is not the What Would Jesus Do challenge that Rev. Maxwell gives the church, but how many people in the church agree to do it. I mean, how often do you see a ton of people agree to a challenge like this? And doing it for a whole year just makes it sound even more implausible. Who, in present time, would do that besides Christians? I know no one that would. Do you?

Another implausible thing is when Rev. Maxwell is elected to give a tent meeting to the people about not going back to the town’s saloon and why it is bad to go back to the saloon and that the saloon is an evil place. When Rev. Maxwell finishes the meeting everyone who attended goes back to the saloon and ignores everything Rev. Maxwell told them. No one even stayed for the after meeting. Who does that!? Rev. Maxwell gave an hour speech on why the saloon is bad and why they should never go back there again. Why would they even ever go back? How often does that even happen? To me, extremely rare.

There are a lot of other implausible points in the book, but there is too much to mention them all. There is a Bible verse that says that through God, everything is possible. I love that verse. It is a very good and influential verse. I love the book and I recommend it as a book you need to read.

Which aspect of the plot of In His Steps so far sounds most implausible? In His Steps was written by Charles Monroe Sheldon. It is said to be one of the best-selling books of all time selling over fifty-million copies first being published in 1896. The full title of the book is In His Steps: What Would Jesus Do. I recently read it as a school book and I really liked it. It is nick-named What Would Jesus Do because at the beginning of the book Rev. Henry Maxwell, the pastor of a church, challenges everyone in the church that in every situation or problem they have they ask themselves “What would Jesus do?” for a whole year (but they did not have to do it if they did not want to). This phrase is referred to throughout the book. Some Christians even use this phrase now, two hundred years after the book was even published.

What I think is most implausible (which means not likely to happen) is when a random person comes to Rev. Maxwell’s house and asks Maxwell to find him a job. Maxwell says he probably can and the person leaves. The next day at church the man comes to church, comes to the pulpit, and says that the church treated him very badly (we never find out how) and passes out. He dies a few days later. I think this is implausible because people randomly passing out and dying later is not possible, and if it is, it is extremely rare.

What I think is also implausible is not the What Would Jesus Do challenge that Rev. Maxwell gives the church, but how many people in the church agree to do it. I mean, how often do you see a ton of people agree to a challenge like this? And doing it for a whole year just makes it sound even more implausible. Who, in present time, would do that besides Christians? I know no one that would. Do you?

Another implausible thing is when Rev. Maxwell is elected to give a tent meeting to the people about not going back to the town’s saloon and why it is bad to go back to the saloon and that the saloon is an evil place. When Rev. Maxwell finishes the meeting everyone who attended goes back to the saloon and ignores everything Rev. Maxwell told them. No one even stayed for the after meeting. Who does that!? Rev. Maxwell gave an hour speech on why the saloon is bad and why they should never go back there again.